|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 3 results for Shafiee
Seyed Shams-Alddin Hosseini, Afsaneh Shafiee, Volume 15, Issue 43 (Autumn 2007)
Abstract
This paper attempts, by further studies of the underlying basic policies regarding the Article 44 of Iranian Constitution, to examine the mutual co-operation of state and market in economic regulation as one of the policy objectives in that Article. The paper consists of three sections. First, we study the views of the main economic schools of thought regarding the role and scope of Government interventions with an emphasis on its regulatory role. It is concluded that the major dominant schools of thought believe the regulatory role of Government in the economy while the discrepancy of views are focused on the scope of intervention and the nature of the regulatory policies. In the second part of this paper, the historical background of Government interventions in the World Economy as well in the Iranian economy are studied and compared. It is shown that the extreme views on the role of state and market in securing economic efficiency are failed, and the general tendency in recent years is focused on the mutual co-operation of state and market in which state has the role of guidance, supervision and regulation as complementary factors to the market performance. The third part of this paper refers to the study of regulatory instruments (such as competitive rules and regulations, regulatory codes and conducts and public ownership of monopolies). In this regard, the historical background of regulatory behavior and its legal foundations in Iran is also considered.
Meysam Shafiee Roodposhti, Seyyed Masoud Hakkaki, Maryam Jalaly, Abolfazl Nori, Volume 22, Issue 70 (Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies 2014)
Abstract
This research has characterized to analyze private banking situation. New phenomenon in our country's banking economy has been studied with pathological approach, after reviewing literature and theoretical background. This paper is applicable from the aspect of purpose and is descriptive-survey from the aspect of identity. In order to collect required data, interview and open questionnaire methods have been applied. Statistical population includes banking managers and active experts in this scope. In order to analyze data, qualitative methodology and Delphi technique have been used. In this process, Affinity Diagram approach is also utilized. Regarding the results, 27 cases of barriers of private banking development identified and classified into 3 classes named executive-structured, perceptual-cognitive and unwillingness barriers. It is necessary to mention that five factors including governmental banking, shortage of facilities, financial resource shortages, human resource shortages, lack of comprehensive talent identification system and economic instability are identified as the main barriers.
Amir Mirshafiee, Hamid Shahrestani, Farhad Ghafari, Abbas Memarnejad, Volume 28, Issue 95 (Quarterly journal of economic research and policies 2020)
Abstract
Policy makers impose policies to improve economy circumstance in order to achieve economic goals. However, the consequence of these policies along with the intended goals will also influence expectations, fluctuations, etc., and cause changes in levels of uncertainty. The important role of the stock market in the economy, makes it important to examine its uncertainty and its interaction with monetary policy.
In this study, the uncertainty of stock market uncertainty is estimated using Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE). For surveying the mutual shocks of monetary policy and uncertainty on each other and output, the impulse respond (IR) that is so useful in structural Vector Auto Regressive (SVAR) models are used. The source of quarterly data is Statistical Center of Iran (S.C.I) from 2001 to 2016. The results of (IR) indicate the monetary policy shocks are effective and lasting in stock market uncertainty and about output have negative effects. While, this stock market uncertainty exacerbated by monetary policy, has a negative effect on output. This means that monetary policy authority; should pay more attention to monetary policy shocks and Keep the economy away from monetary shocks.
|
|