|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 4 results for Privatization
Seyed Hosein Sajadi, Mehdi Arabi, Maryam Falahi, Volume 21, Issue 68 (1-2014)
Abstract
The purpose of this research is investigation of the privatization process effect on productivity indexes of Listed Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Productivity indexes in this research are capital productivity and employee productivity. Sample of research is 42 firms listed in Tehran stock exchange that using the pooled data system and ordinary least square regressions (OLS) model, have been analyzed for the period of 2003-2010. The results show that capital productivity and employee productivity relinquished companies have been promoted after privatization and the amount of privatization have significant positive relation with the capital and employee productivity.
Miss Elahe Afruzkelardehi, Miss Parisa Mohajeri, Mr Ali Nasiry Aghdam, Volume 27, Issue 89 (5-2019)
Abstract
the present study was to investigate the impact of ownership type on the performance of Iranian banks. To this end, the performance of the given banks was measured by three indices including return on equity, return on assets, and cost-to-operating income ratio. The bank assets, loan-to-deposit ratio, liquidity ratio, leverage ratio, operating profit margin ratio, and debt-to-asset ratio were also included in the model as control variables. Moreover, three dummy variables were defined to investigate ownership effect, privatization effect, as well as the effect of getting listed on the stock exchange. The time period of the study was between 2004 and 2015. Besides, the study covered 17 banks including 7 private banks, 6 state-owned banks, and 4 privatized banks. In general, the results of the generalized estimating equation of the population-averaged model in the Stata 14.2 software indicated that private banks had yielded better performance indices compared with state-owned ones, but privatization of state-owned, had not brought about an improvement as well as increased efficiency in these banks.
Ph.d Allameh Tabataba'i University Tari, Ph.d Teymour Mohammadi, Ph.d Abbas Shakeri, Mr Mohsen Fadavi, Volume 27, Issue 90 (9-2019)
Abstract
Privatization means assigning the ownership and management of the state firms to the private sector. Following this, it is expected that the efficiency of firms will increase, and so the firms gain more benefits. In the present paper, the performance of the state, private and privatized banks have been compared through studying the effects of privatization on the performance of banking system in terms of liquidity. This study has been conducted using the data of 11 banks during a 13-year period (2005-2017). Three groups of tests including panel regression tests, parametric and non-parametric tests have been used which all three tests have had the same results. The panel regression model has been used to study the effects of privatization on liquidity of the banking system as a whole. The results of model estimation show that privatization has had a significant and positive impact on banks performance in terms of liquidity. In the next step, parametric and non-parametric tests have been conducted to compare the performance of privatized banks in periods after and before applying the privatization. The results show a significant difference in these two periods. Then, the performances of privatized banks in the periods before and after applying the privatization have been compared to the performances of state and private banks. Findings show that compared with state and private banks, the performance of privatized banks has been improved.
Zohreh Aalipour, Vahid Chenari, Ezatollah Kiani, Foad Makvandi, Ganbar Amirnejad, Volume 32, Issue 109 (6-2024)
Abstract
For 30 years, global development has demanded a new approach for cooperation between government, people and businesses to achieve health goals. The aim of the current research is to Design a Pattern to reduce the government's tenure in the field of health by approaching the government as a responsible observer in line with the realization of the general policies of Article 44 of the Constitution. The research method is a combination of qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative part, by using 200 articles related to structural reform medels in other countries, as well as internal laws and regulations and experts' opinions, tried to explain the dimensions, components and indicators of the research, including 5 key dimensions related to the field of governance, 11 components and 57 indicators, and 9 methods of reducing tenure and designing 2 questionnaires. Finally, to analyze the quantitative data of the research, the structural equation method was used using the combined ISM-DEMATEL method to explain the relationships between dimensions, components and indicators (the first questionnaire) and Shannon's entropy method to prioritize the methods of reducing tenure (the second questionnaire). The result of this research shows that this is a complex but inevitable policy that must be determined when it starts. It also recommends interventions in several fields, such as the need to formulate general goals and policies in the field of health with a comprehensive approach, the key players of which are the government, the private sector, civil society, and the health sector.
|
|