Development of Supervisory Technology (SupTech) in Iran's Financial Industry: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach

Mohammadian, Ayoub; Abdollahi, Ali; Hasanabadi, Hamid; Sohrabi, Babak

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Journal of Economic Research and Policies

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Contact us

statistical info

Indexing and Abstracting

Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC)
Google Scholar
SID (Scientific Information Database)
Magiran
Noormags

Islamic Economic Association Of Iran

Social Media

Paper Plagiarism Checker

Volume 33, Issue 114 (quarterly journal of economic research and policies 2025)

qjerp 2025, 33(114): 100-162

Back to browse issues page

Development of Supervisory Technology (SupTech) in Iran's Financial Industry: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach

Ayoub Mohammadian ^*

, Ali Abdollahi

, Hamid Hasanabadi

, Babak Sohrabi

Department of Information Technology Management, Faculty of Technology and Industrial Management, College of Management, University of Tehran , mohamadian@ut.ac.ir

Abstract: (1380 Views)

The use of advanced technologies in financial supervision can enable faster and more accurate identification of violations and risks. In this regard, supervisory technology (SUPTECH) has been proposed as one of the most important technological innovations in the financial industry and is expected to play a key role in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of supervisory processes. The aim of this research is to identify and model the key factors affecting the development of SUPTECH in the financial industry. The results of the research show that 9 factors for the development of SUPTECH are placed at five levels; these factors were also divided into four main categories by conducting a micro-analysis. Accordingly, in order to strengthen the development of SUPTECH in the Iranian financial industry, it is suggested that support and incentive programs be designed and implemented for financial institutions and venture capitalists, and that support funds be launched for start-up companies in this field. Developing data processing infrastructure, developing specialized human resource training programs, and reviewing regulations to adapt to new technologies are other key requirements. Also, establishing coordination mechanisms between regulatory institutions, strengthening interaction with technological and emerging players, and utilizing the capacity of universities and media to raise public awareness of new tools should be a priority for policymakers.

Keywords: Supervisory Technology, SupTech, Financial Industry, Meta-Synthesis, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM)

Full-Text [PDF 874 kb] (620 Downloads)

Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special

References

1. Aktas E. & K. Roland (2021). "Fintech Revolution, Regulatory and Supervisory Challenges, and Opportunities for Improvement by Utilizing RegTech and SupTech". International Journal of Business Research Information Technology, 8(1).

2. Allen H. J. (2024). "Regulating fintech: A harm focused approach". Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105910. [DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105910]

3. Ardiansyah A. & A.A. Arman (2022). "Regulation Compliance Supervision Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis In 2022". International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI) IEEE. pp. 138-144. [DOI:10.1109/ICITSI56531.2022.9971071]

4. Arner D.W., Barberis J. & R.P. Buckley (2017). "FinTech, RegTech and SupTech: What They Mean for Financial Supervision". Journal of Financial Transformation.

5. Attri R., Dev N. & V. Sharma (2013). "Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview". Research journal of management sciences, 2319(2), 1171.

6. Bank for International Settlements (BIS). (2022). The Role of SupTech in Financial Supervision. https://www.bis.org

7. Barrière F. (2021). "Financial law in the era of artificial intelligence: key topics and themes". Law Financial Markets Review, 15(3-4), pp. 312-322 [DOI:10.1080/17521440.2023.2215480]

8. Bholat D. & D. Susskind (2021). "The assessment: artificial intelligence and financial services". Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(3), pp. 417-434. [DOI:10.1093/oxrep/grab015]

9. de Paz J.C.L. (2023). "Some implications of the new global digital economy for financial regulation and supervision". Journal of Banking Regulation, 24(2), 146. [DOI:10.1057/s41261-022-00189-1] []

10. Du J. & Wei L. (2020, November). "An analysis of regulatory technology in the Internet financial sector in conjunction with the logit model". In 2020 2nd International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering (ICEMME) IEEE. pp. 428-431. [DOI:10.1109/ICEMME51517.2020.00091] []

11. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). (2022). The Future of SupTech: A Regulatory Perspective.

12. Financial Stability Board (FSB). (2021). The Use of SupTech in Supervision: Trends and Challenges. https://www.fsb.org

13. Gasparri G. (2019). "Risks and opportunities of RegTech and SupTech developments". Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2, 14. [DOI:10.3389/frai.2019.00014] [PMID] []

14. Giudici P. (2018). "Fintech risk management: A research challenge for artificial intelligence in finance". Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 1, 1. [DOI:10.3389/frai.2018.00001] [PMID] []

15. Giudici P., Hochreiter, R., Osterrieder, J., Papenbrock, J., & Schwendner, P. (2019). AI and financial technology. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2, 25. [DOI:10.3389/frai.2019.00025] [PMID] []

16. Gomber P., Koch J.A. & M. Siering (2022). "RegTech and SupTech: The Role of Big Data and AI in Financial Regulation". Journal of Financial Regulation.

17. Grassi L. & D. Lanfranchi (2022). "RegTech in public and private sectors: the nexus between data, technology and regulation". Journal of Industrial Business Economics, 49(3), pp. 441-479. [DOI:10.1007/s40812-022-00226-0]

18. Guerra P., Castelli M. & N. Côrte-Real (2022). "Approaching European Supervisory Risk Assessment with SupTech: A Proposal of an Early Warning System". Risks, 10(4), pp. 71. [DOI:10.3390/risks10040071]

19. Jagrič T., Zdolšek D., Horvat R., Kolar I., Erker N., Merhar J. & V. Jagrič (2023). "New Suptech Tool of the Predictive Generation for Insurance Companies-The Case of the European Market". Information, 14(10), pp. 565. [DOI:10.3390/info14100565]

20. Jiaying J. (2021). "Technology-Enabled Co-Regulation for Blockchain Implementation". U. Pitt. L. Rev., 83, 829. [DOI:10.5195/lawreview.2022.876]

21. Jović Ž. & I. Nikolić (2022). The darker side of fintech: the emergence of new risks. Zagreb International Review of Economics, 25(SCI), pp. 46-63. [DOI:10.2478/zireb-2022-0024]

22. Khalatur S., Pavlova H., Vasilieva L., Karamushka D. & A. Danileviča (2022). "Innovation management as basis of digitalization trends and security of financial sector". Entrepreneurship Sustainability Issues, 9(4), 56. [DOI:10.9770/jesi.2022.9.4(3)]

23. Khanin I., Bilozubenko V. & Y. Sopin (2022). "Improving the level of economic effectiveness of electronic payment services in a global digital economy". Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(1), pp. 148-158. [DOI:10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-1-148-158]

24. Kondratyeva M.N., Svirina D.D. & A.I. Tsvetkov (2021). "The role of information technologies in ensuring banking security". In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 1047, No. 1, p. 012069. [DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/1047/1/012069]

25. Kraus K. & N. Kraus (2020). Digital cubic space as a new economic augmented reality. Sci. innov., 16(3), pp. 92-105. [DOI:10.15407/scine16.03.092]

26. Kristanto A.D. & A.A. Arman (2022). "Towards A Smart Regulatory Compliance, The Capabilities of RegTech and SupTech". In 2022 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI) IEEE. pp. 300-309. [DOI:10.1109/ICITSI56531.2022.9970801]

27. Kristanto A.D. & A.A. Arman (2024). "A Generic Framework for Developing Regulatory Technology and Supervisory Technology". Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 102(6).

28. Kshetri N. (2023). "Regulatory technology and supervisory technology: status, facilitators, and barriers". Computer Law Security Review, 56(1), pp. 64-75. [DOI:10.1109/MC.2022.3205780]

29. Loiacono G. & E. Rulli (2022). "ResTech: innovative technologies for crisis resolution". Journal of Banking Regulation, 23(3), 227. [DOI:10.1057/s41261-021-00154-4] []

30. Maheshwari S. & N.N. Chatnani (2023). "Applications of artificial intelligence and Machine learning-based supervisory technology in financial Markets surveillance: A review of literature". FIIB Business Review, 23197145231189990. [DOI:10.1177/23197145231189990]

31. Manzhura O., Pochenchuk G. & N. Kraus (2022). "Innovative changes in financial and tax systems in the conditions of digital transformation". Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(1), pp. 94-102. [DOI:10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-1-94-102]

32. Mayasari D. & A.A. Arman (2022). "SupTech Governance in Regulatory/Supervisory Government Agencies: A Systematic Literature Review". In 2022 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI) IEEE. pp. 151-156. [DOI:10.1109/ICITSI56531.2022.9970863]

33. Mayasari D. & A.A. Arman (2023). "Supervision Transformation in Government Institutions". Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 101(23).

34. McCarthy J. (2023). "The regulation of RegTech and SupTech in finance: ensuring consistency in principle and in practice". Journal of Financial Regulation Compliance, 31(2), pp. 186-199. [DOI:10.1108/JFRC-01-2022-0004]

35. Michael B. (2021). "Will FinTech Cause a Reconsideration of the Administrative and International Law Governing Public Procurement?". Eur. Procurement, Pub. Private Partnership L. Rev., 16, 229. https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2021/3/8 [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3911686]

36. Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). (2021). SupTech Innovations in Financial Regulation.

37. Monkiewicz J. & M. Monkiewicz (2022). Financial sector supervision in digital age: transformation in progress. Foundations of Management, 14(1), pp. 25-36. [DOI:10.2478/fman-2022-0002]

38. Neely A., Mills J., Platts K., Richards H., Gregory M., Bourne M. & M. Kennerley (2000). Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process‐based approach. International journal of operations & production management, 20(10), pp. 1119-1145. [DOI:10.1108/01443570010343708]

39. Sandelowski M., Barroso J. & C.I. Voils (2007). "Using qualitative meta summary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings". Research in nursing & health, 30(1), pp. 99-111. [DOI:10.1002/nur.20176] [PMID] []

40. Siciliani P. (2019). "The Disruption of the Prudential Regulatory Framework". Journal of Financial Regulation, 5(2), pp. 220-238. [DOI:10.1093/jfr/fjz009]

41. Singh Shankar R., Narain R. & A. Agarwal (2003). "An interpretive structural modeling of knowledge management in engineering industries". Journal of Advances in Management Research, 1(1), pp. 28-40. [DOI:10.1108/97279810380000356]

42. State of SupTech report (2022), Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF), Retrieved from University of Cambridge: http://www.cambridgesuptechlab.org/SOS

43. Sushkova O. (2021). "Legal risks of using regulatory technologies in business and professional activities". In SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. Vol. 106, p. 02013. [DOI:10.1051/shsconf/202110602013]

44. Wolfswinkel J.F., Furtmueller E. & Wilderom, C. P. J. E. j. o. i. s. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. 22(1), pp. 45-55. [DOI:10.1057/ejis.2011.51]

45. Zeranski S. & I.E. Sancak (2021). Prudential supervisory disclosure (PSD) with supervisory technology (SupTech): lessons from a FinTech crisis. International Journal of Disclosure Governance, 18(4), 315-335. [DOI:10.1057/s41310-021-00111-7]

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Mohammadian A, Abdollahi A, Hasanabadi H, Sohrabi B. Development of Supervisory Technology (SupTech) in Iran's Financial Industry: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. qjerp 2025; 33 (114) :100-162
URL: http://qjerp.ir/article-1-3698-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ۴.۰ International License (CC BY ۴.۰)

Volume 33, Issue 114 (quarterly journal of economic research and policies 2025)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.03 seconds with 44 queries by YEKTAWEB 4732