[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
statistical info::
::
Indexing and Abstracting
..
Islamic Economic Association Of Iran

..
Social Media




 
..
Paper Plagiarism Checker


 
..
:: Volume 33, Issue 116 (quarterly journal of economic research and policies 2026) ::
qjerp 2026, 33(116): 6-47 Back to browse issues page
Study the Welfare Effects of Export Subsidy Policy (Case Study: Dates)
Ali Akbar Baghestani * , Fatemeh Sakhi , Manouchehr Shahmoradifard
Agricultural Planning, Economy and Rural Development Research Institute , a.baghestany@gmail.com
Abstract:   (157 Views)

The export of agricultural products is influenced by factors such as global and domestic prices, exchange rates, the income of importing countries, as well as the quality, standards, and health of the produced goods. However, a relative reduction in production costs and export risks also holds significant importance. Export subsidies, by affecting the export supply function, have varying welfare effects on stakeholders. In this context, dates are considered one of the major export products in Iran's agricultural sector. This study aimed to analyze the welfare effects of export subsidies on dates, utilizing panel data from 2011 to 2021. The results indicated that in the import demand function, the weighted index of real GDP in importing countries, Iran's date production (with a one-period lag), the exchange rate in major date-importing countries from Iran, and Iran's date cultivation area had a positive and significant effect on date imports from Iran. Conversely, Iran's export unit price of dates and the global export unit price of dates had a negative and significant impact. In the export supply function, Iran's date production, global date exports (in the current and lagged periods), Iran's export unit price of dates, Iran's date exports (with a one-period lag), and the global export unit price of dates had a positive and significant effect on Iran's date exports. This research found that granting export subsidies on dates at rates of 7% and 10% led to an increase of 17.8% and 20%, respectively, in the country's total date exports. Furthermore, export subsidies on dates affected the welfare of producers and exporters more than that of consumers. It is recommended that policymakers consider government costs when implementing such policies.

Keywords: Export demand function, Export supply function, Dates, Export subsidy
Full-Text [PDF 937 kb]   (100 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Alizadeh M. (‎‌2010‌‎). The economic effects of targeting subsidies. Journal of Urban Economics, (‎‌8‌‎), ‎‌1-12‌‎.‎‎[In Persian]‎
2. Asadi N., Hatami A., Rastegarnia R. & A. Mohammadalian (‎‌2015‌‎). Investigating the impact of credit ‎insurance coverage on the export of agricultural products. ‎‌2nd international e-conference on green ‎economics. Mazandaran,Iran.[In Persian]‎
3. Azarbayjani K., Sarkhosh Sara A. & A. Esmailpour (2015). Analysis of the Impact of Export Insurance Subsidy on Non-Oil Exports. The Economic Research (Sustainable Growth and Development), 15 (1),123-139. [In Persian]
4. Azimi H. & M. Yahyazadehfar (2013). The Effect of Incentive Programs and Export Supports on the Trade of Agricultural Products. Economic Modeling, 7(2), 121-135. ‎[In Persian]‎
5. Choi H. & K. Kim (2021). Effect of export credit insurance on export performance: an empirical analysis of Korea. Asian Economic Journal, 35(4), 413-433. [DOI:10.1111/asej.12252]
6. Brown L.K. & E. Troutt (2018). A re-analysis of the trade and welfare effects of export subsidies. Applied Economics Letters, 25(6), 420-424. [DOI:10.1080/13504851.2017.1329925]
7. Dehghani A. & M. Ameri (‎‌2015‌‎). The Effect of Structural and Behavioral Variables and Investment ‎Productivity on the Export of Iranian Food Industries (A Panel Data Approach). Journal of Economic ‎Modeling Research, ‎‌5‌‎ (‎‌19‌‎),‎‌239-267‌‎.‎‎[In Persian]‎ [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jemr.5.19.239]
8. Ebrahimi A., Jaferi Z., Ahmadi A. & L. Nasrolahi Vosta (2013). Performance Evaluation of Stone Export. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 4(13), 163-187. ‎[In Persian]‎
9. Eghbalsefat F., Mojaverian S.M., Shirzadi Laskookalayeh S. & H. Asadpour (2024). The Effect of Policy Interventions on Export Efficiency and Potential of Two Main Agricultural Export Products (Pistachio & Saffron), Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 28(112), 1-42. ‎[In Persian]‎
10. Enders W. (2012). Applied econometric time series. Privredna kretanja i ekonomska politika,132, 93.
11. Esmailpour S., Assadzadeh A., Shokri M. & H. Shokri (2017). Analysis of the Impact of Export Insurance Subsidies on Non-Oil Export: Fuzzy Regression Approach. Economic Growth and Development Research, 7(28), 99-112. ‎[In Persian]‎
12. Estakhr M., Zibaei M. & M.H. Tarazkar (2010). Investigating Impact of Export Insurance Subsidy on Agricultural Export. Agricultural Economics, 3(4), 185-202 ‎[In Persian]‎.
13. Farris P.L. (1971). Export supply and demand for U.S. Cattle hides. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,53,643-646. [DOI:10.2307/1237829]
14. Farrokhi F. & A. Soderbery (2024). Trade elasticities in general equilibrium: Demand, supply, and aggregation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1-45. [DOI:10.1162/rest_a_01515]
15. Finkbeiner C. (1979). Estimation for the multiple factor model when data are missing. Journal of Psychometrika, 44(4), 409-420. [DOI:10.1007/BF02296204]
16. Goldstein M. & M.S.Khan (1978).The supply and demand for exports: a simultaneous approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 275-286. [DOI:10.2307/1924981]
17. Grant M. & A. Soderbery (2024). Heteroskedastic supply and demand estimation: Analysis and testing. Journal of International Economics, 150, 103817. [DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2023.103817]
18. Hasanov F. (2012). The impact of the real exchange rate on non-oil exports. Is there an asymmetric adjustment towards the equilibrium? The George Washington University, RPF Working Paper 2012-005 (May 2012),1-24.
19. Karbasi A.R. & J. Akbarzadeh (2008). Estimation of export supply and demand functions for Iran saffron by simultaneous equations system. Agricultural Economics and Development, 16(2), 33-52. ‎[In Persian]‎
20. Khalifi Sikaroudi L. & M. Shokat Fadaei (‎‌2015‌‎). A study on effects of exchange rate and foreign policies on Iran's ‎dates export during the years ‎‌1991-2006‎.Agricultural Economics Research, ‎‌4‌‎(‎‌4‌‎), ‎‌97-112‌‎.‎‎[In Persian]‎
21. Khan I.U. & K. Kalirajan (1981). The impact of trade costs on exports: An empirical modeling. Journal of Economic Modeling, 28,1341-1347. [DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2011.02.031]
22. Koorehpazan Z., Yazdani S., Mahmoodi A., Ejlali F. & J. koorkinejad (2025). Investigating the Effects of Export Subsidy Policy on Pistachio and Walnut Exports in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 32(3). ‎[In Persian]‎
23. Kuchakzadeh A., Jalaei Esfandabadi S.A. & S. Kuchakzadeh (‎‌2015‌‎).The Effects of Exchange Rate ‎Uncertainty on Export of Iranian Date. Agricultural Economics Research, ‎‌7‌‎(‎‌25‌‎), ‎‌157-171.‎[In Persian]‎
24. Li J., Chen X., De Maeyer P., Van de Voorde T. & Y. Li (2025). Investigating the supply-demand gap of farmland ecosystem services to advance sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Central Asia. Agricultural Water Management, 312, 109419. [DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109419]
25. Mah J.S. (2006). The effect of export insurance subsidy on export supply: The experience of Japan. Journal of Asian Economics, 17,646-652. [DOI:10.1016/j.asieco.2006.05.004]
26. Mehdizadehrayeni M., Mohammadi H., Dehdashti M. & O. Sharifi (2022). Welfare effects of increasing competition in the market of agricultural export products (Case study: Pistachio product). Journal of Pistachio Science and Technology, 7(12), 172-189. ‎[In Persian]
27. Memar Nejad A., Shiri B. & H. Kakhki (‎‌2013‌‎). Customs System and the Necessity of Its. Quarterly Journal ‎of Fiscal and Economic Policies,‎‌1‌‎ (‎‌2‌‎),‎‌121-142‌‎.‎‎[In Persian]‎
28. Moshabaki A. & A.A. Khademi (‎‌2012‌‎). The Effect of Export Promotion Programs on Firm Export ‎Performance. Journal of Improvement Management, ‎‌6‌‎(‎‌3‌‎), ‎‌98-135. ‎[In Persian]‎
29. Ningi Sama'ila Idi. (2013). An Analysis of Banks Financing of Non-Oil Exports in Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(1), 85-92.
30. Pourebrahim F. & A. Esmaeili (2010). Analyzing the impact of export premium on agricultural export development. Agricultural Economics, 4(1), 115-135.
31. Polot A. & M. Yesilyaprak (2017). Export credit insurance and export performance: An empirical gravity analysis for Turkey. Int J Econ Finan, 9,12-24. [DOI:10.5539/ijef.v9n8p12]
32. Sadeghi H., Vafaie Yeganeh R., Mohammad Ghaffari H. & A. Masaeli (2010). Estimating Transaction Costs in Iran: Using a Fuzzy Logic approach.The Economic Research (Sustainable Growth and Development), 10(3),125-149. ‎[In Persian]‎
33. Sanei B. & R. Saadat (‎‌2013‌‎). The Effect of Reduction of Electricity Subsidy on Macro Indices Affecting the ‎Sectoral Production in Iran. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, ‎‌17‌‎(‎‌67‌‎),1-20‌.[In Persian]‎
34. Sarwar G. & D.G. Anderson (1990). Estimating the soybean exports: a simultaneous supply/demand approach. Journal of Economic Studies, 17(1), 41-56. [DOI:10.1108/EUM0000000000142]
35. Tong L.A. Pham, C. S. & M.A. Ulubaşoğlu (2019). The effects of farm subsidies on farm exports in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 101(4), 1277-1304. [DOI:10.1093/ajae/aay112]
36. Tandoğan N.Ş. (2022). Impact of agricultural supports on the agricultural export. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(1), 92-103. [DOI:10.17153/oguiibf.976425]
37. Vazifehdust H. & N. Zarinnegar (‎‌2009‌‎).Investigating the performance of government policies on ‎companies' exports. Journal of Insight, ‎‌16‌‎(‎‌44‌‎),‎‌3-13‌‎.‎‎[In Persian]‎
38. Vesal M. & M. Kiani (2024). The Impact of Export Subsidies on the Volume and Price of Export: the case of agricultural products using difference-in-differences. Journal of Economic Research and Policies,32 (110), 6-80. ‎[In Persian]‎ [DOI:10.61186/qjerp.32.110.6]
39. Yin X. & X. Yin (‎‌2005‌‎). Can developing countries benefit from export promotion?. Journal of ‎Economic Studies,‎‌32‌‎(‎‌1‌‎), ‎‌60-80‎.‎ [DOI:10.1108/01443580510574841]
40. Zhao Y., Bai Z., Liu L., Fan X. & L. Ma (2024). Impacts of subsidy for export of pig to domestic market on the spatial distribution of pig production and related nitrogen losses in China. Science of The Total Environment, 907, 167990. [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167990] [PMID]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Baghestani A A, Sakhi F, Shahmoradifard M. Study the Welfare Effects of Export Subsidy Policy (Case Study: Dates). qjerp 2026; 33 (116) :6-47
URL: http://qjerp.ir/article-1-3741-en.html


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ۴.۰ International License (CC BY ۴.۰)
Volume 33, Issue 116 (quarterly journal of economic research and policies 2026) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه پژوهشها و سیاستهای اقتصادی Journal of Economic Research and Policies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4745